Blackhawk 的钱币相册

1750-Mo MF 8 R Yon-M8-50 Calico-474 N1 PCGS #670084

Spanish 8 Reales from Mexico City of Ferdinand VI type. Two nice relief chops, one obverse, one reverse. Featured in the March 2014 issue of Chopmark News. The obverse symbol is ? meaning Sheng or Cheng, presumably a family name. The Ferdinand VI series was issued from 1747-1760.

1872-Ga C Peso KM-408.3 N1 PCGS #735109

Balance Scale Peso sourced from the Guadalajara mint in Mexico. The Mexico Balance Scale Peso series was issued from just 1869-1873. Original mintage of 485,000, this issue is scarce to rare, chop marks or not. Known as "Balanzas" in the orient, the Balance Scale Peso is similar to the US Trade Dollar in that it was not a success in the export market in China, the destination for most of Mexico's silver. The type was discontinued in 1873 and the Cap and Rays 8 Reales design was once again adopted. This example is brilliant with sharp AU details and pretty toning and two interesting reverse chop marks. In his book focused on Chopmarks, Gullberg states it is fairly easy to find Balance Scale pesos with chopmarks. This has not been my experience, especially for one with the eye appeal of this example.

1855-S 50C Arrows N1 PCGS #6284

US Liberty Seated half dollar, with Arrows from the mint in San Francisco California. The US Liberty Seated half dollar series was issued from 1839-1891. The centerpiece of my chopmark collection. This coin stands on its own, at the same time it epitomizes what I set out to find for this collection - attractive and well-preserved pieces with chopmarks to signify their usage in commerce.

This example is a key date within the seated half series, with only 4 known true uncirculated examples. This example shows convincing uncirculated details and luster, with only the chopmarks keeping it from joining the elite group of 4 uncirculated examples known.

One obverse chopmark is weakly impressed with one reverse chopmark, both centered. My first thought was to confirm the chopmarks are legitimate and I am convinced they are. The first and possibly most convincing factor is that adding chops to this coin greatly diminishes the value. Second, the single, centered chopmarks are consistent with many other chopmarked examples of seated halves from this period. Something that initially concerned me about the coin is an apparent lack of reciprocal damage from the chopmarks. However, after viewing the coin in hand I can see the damage is present, although faint.

The obverse chop symbol is ? meaning "glory". The reverse chop symbol is ? meaning "central" or "middle".

A very attractive, neat coin that I am honored to hold in this collection.

1885-CC $1 XF45 PCGS #7160

Very hard to find in any circulated grade, PCGS has graded less than 50 in circulated condition. What makes this even more cool is that this is a VAM-2A, apparently an R6 and hardly ever seen. I wonder how many other circulated examples of this VAM exist.

1885-CC $1 XF45 PCGS #7160

Very hard to find in any circulated grade, PCGS has graded less than 50 in circulated condition. What makes this even more cool is that this is a VAM-2A, apparently an R6 and hardly ever seen. I wonder how many other circulated examples of this VAM exist.

1876 T$1 Obverse 1, Reverse 2 MS64 PCGS #40111

A neatly toned Type I/II centennial year issue preserved in mint state. Of note, this coin shares the same reverse die as the 1876 4F Type I/II proof and 1876 Type II/II proof and business strike issues. A good example of a die that was used to strike both circulation and proof issue coins. This one has prooflike surfaces with die cracks. Higher grade than I normally target but it was attractive and with the shared reverse die I liked it for study. I have only seen 2 or 3 business strikes of this die pair, I don't think many were made. The picture looks cartoonish but the surfaces and tone are really nice. That's what you get from proof dies.

1876 T$1 Obverse 1, Reverse 2 MS64 PCGS #40111

A neatly toned Type I/II centennial year issue preserved in mint state. Of note, this coin shares the same reverse die as the 1876 4F Type I/II proof and 1876 Type II/II proof and business strike issues. A good example of a die that was used to strike both circulation and proof issue coins. This one has prooflike surfaces with die cracks. Higher grade than I normally target but it was attractive and with the shared reverse die I liked it for study. I have only seen 2 or 3 business strikes of this die pair, I don't think many were made. The picture looks cartoonish but the surfaces and tone are really nice. That's what you get from proof dies.

1876 T$1 PR63CAM PCGS #87056

Type I/II 4 Finger. A pretty example of this "transitional" proof with nice mirrored surfaces. Note the obverse shows the liberty scroll tips pointing down and to the left, as normally seen on a Type I obverse. However, Liberty's outstretched hand shows 4 fingers, as normally seen on a Type II obverse. It is unknown how or why this die came to be, whether it was an experimental die, an accidental mistake, or something else. I estimate that about 10% of all 1876 proofs are of this Type I/II 4 Finger variety. CAC Approved.

1876 T$1 PR63CAM PCGS #87056

Type I/II 4 Finger. A pretty example of this "transitional" proof with nice mirrored surfaces. Note the obverse shows the liberty scroll tips pointing down and to the left, as normally seen on a Type I obverse. However, Liberty's outstretched hand shows 4 fingers, as normally seen on a Type II obverse. It is unknown how or why this die came to be, whether it was an experimental die, an accidental mistake, or something else. I estimate that about 10% of all 1876 proofs are of this Type I/II 4 Finger variety. CAC Approved.

1876 T$1 PR63CAM PCGS #87056

Type I/II 4 Finger. A pretty example of this "transitional" proof with nice mirrored surfaces. Note the obverse shows the liberty scroll tips pointing down and to the left, as normally seen on a Type I obverse. However, Liberty's outstretched hand shows 4 fingers, as normally seen on a Type II obverse. It is unknown how or why this die came to be, whether it was an experimental die, an accidental mistake, or something else. I estimate that about 10% of all 1876 proofs are of this Type I/II 4 Finger variety. CAC Approved.

1876-CC T$1 Doubled Die Reverse AU58 PCGS #97042

Great lustrous and original example of this rare DDR. A high end 58 and CAC Approved. Neat late obverse die state.

1876 T$1 TDV-18, Type II/II N1 PCGS #510103

The 1876 Type II/Type II is very rare, this one popped up raw on a eBay in early 2012. The coin looks to have been through a few wars, with some dark staining on the obverse. PCGS deemed that it has"environmental damage" probably based on what looks like an ink stain on the obverse. I have studied this coin for hours and I'm still not 100% convinced that it is either a business strike or an impaired proof. In the right light, the flash of proof-like fields can be observed. Along with the lack of die cracks, this coin possibly was struck as a proof. On the other hand, the obverse head and reverse eagle's talon are not well struck, as one might expect of a proof issue. Based on appearance alone, my gut says this is a worn, spent proof issue coin however there appear to be 2 planchet flaws in the right obverse field around stars 11 and 12. Maybe this was a proof, rejected for quality issues? Either way, a tough coin to find with the Type II/Type II obverse/reverse combination. I'll go with PCGS on this one and refrain from offering a grade. It has it's problems but I'd rather have this look than a scrubbed white coin. I'm waiting patiently for a nice properly graded example to come along. Some day.

1876 T$1 TDV-18, Type II/II N1 PCGS #510103

The 1876 Type II/Type II is very rare, this one popped up raw on a eBay in early 2012. The coin looks to have been through a few wars, with some dark staining on the obverse. PCGS deemed that it has"environmental damage" probably based on what looks like an ink stain on the obverse. I have studied this coin for hours and I'm still not 100% convinced that it is either a business strike or an impaired proof. In the right light, the flash of proof-like fields can be observed. Along with the lack of die cracks, this coin possibly was struck as a proof. On the other hand, the obverse head and reverse eagle's talon are not well struck, as one might expect of a proof issue. Based on appearance alone, my gut says this is a worn, spent proof issue coin however there appear to be 2 planchet flaws in the right obverse field around stars 11 and 12. Maybe this was a proof, rejected for quality issues? Either way, a tough coin to find with the Type II/Type II obverse/reverse combination. I'll go with PCGS on this one and refrain from offering a grade. It has it's problems but I'd rather have this look than a scrubbed white coin. I'm waiting patiently for a nice properly graded example to come along. Some day.

1876 T$1 TDV-16, Type I/II, Recut Finger XF40 PCGS #999358

Type 1.5/2 circulation strike example, struck from proof dies. The obverse shows characteristics of both the Type 1 obverse with the tails of Liberty scroll pointing downwards, but also characteristics of the Type 2 obverse with Liberty's outstretched hand showing a thumb and 4 fingers. This is one of my favorite varieties.

1876 T$1 TDV-16, Type I/II, Recut Finger XF40 PCGS #999358

Type 1.5/2 circulation strike example, struck from proof dies. The obverse shows characteristics of both the Type 1 obverse with the tails of Liberty scroll pointing downwards, but also characteristics of the Type 2 obverse with Liberty's outstretched hand showing a thumb and 4 fingers. This is one of my favorite varieties.